Wednesday, June 22, 2011
Decisions, Decisions.... and Touching the Feet of Christ
Fr. Robert Behnke |
This past week, likewise, events altered my usual method, in that an item in the news so caught my attention that I decided there was a reason to switch the course of my homily theme and remarks. I had intended to address that this day, in the ordinary form of the Roman Rite, logically can only be called Ascension Thursday Sunday, an illogical title for an illogic observance of the Ascension of Our Lord—though this is not an issue in this extraordinary form (though I saw online that today there is an Tridentine observance of what is called an external solemnity of the Ascension at St. John Cantius, a Mass offer by Bishop Morlino of Madison, Wisconsin). I thought when it happened, and experience now confirms my opinion, that the decision on the part of most provinces’ bishops to move the feast to Sunday makes little sense, especially because this particular feast so clearly demands a Thursday observance to be in line with Scripture and the Tradition. So I thought this feast-on-wheels would provide a fitting opportunity to speak about the important difference in the Faith between divinely revealed truth (which comes from God Who can neither deceive nor be deceived) and mere human decision, which can obviously be mistaken, even tragically mistaken, and even mistaken when decided by a priest, a bishop, or even a whole gaggle of bishops. If you have not heard, the Bishops Conference of England and Wales has reinstituted abstinence from meat on every Friday of the year, beginning this coming September; these same bishops are seriously considering moving, from Sundays, the Epiphany back to January 6th, the Ascension back to 40 days after Easter Sunday, and Corpus Christi back to the Thursday after Trinity Sunday. They did not have to admit to a mistake in having moved these feasts from their centuries-old place in the calendar to the nearest Sunday, since their consideration of changing the change speaks for itself. It is important for Catholics, as aggravated as any Catholic might become by a decision of priests or bishops with which one may even vehemently disagrees, to remember that not all decisions taken by the Church are of equal importance (our salvation does not depend, for example, on the date of the Feast of Corpus Christi), and that the Holy Spirit, Whose coming the Church celebrates next Sunday on Pentecost, remains always with the Church, to prevent and impede such decisions that would otherwise prove fatal for the Faith.
That was my plan—that was where my preparation was taking me—until last Friday. The past week was kind of a bad news week for Catholics, and for any genuinely believing Christians. First, civil union licenses on June 1st, then civil union ceremonies on June 2nd—all accompanied by much media fanfare and public falderal, sickening and patronizing speeches by politicians, and plenty of Eli’s cheesecake to go around. And then the announcement that the dioceses of Rockford, Peoria, and Joliet have shut down their foster-care apparatus because of the new civil union law (our archdiocese stopped foster-care services in 2007 because of a similar county ordinance and an insurance issue). Many of the readers’ comments in the Tribune regarding these diocesan shutdowns were nothing but hateful and biased. Then, Friday morning, I saw the news that the Holy Father received Vice-President Biden who was in Rome to observe the 150th anniversary of the Italian nation. It wasn’t that audience which angered me; the Holy Father is the pastor of the whole world, and in his being that pastor, he is charged with correction of any wayward member of his flock. The fact that the audience was not on the pope’s public schedule and was not announced ahead of time by either the Vatican or the White House, and the fact that no comment by either party was made after the audience, leads to a reasonable speculation that perhaps a kind of scolding took place. It wasn’t the vice-president who was doing the scolding. The fact of the meeting came to light only because reporters, who were present to cover the arrival of the president of the Palestinian territories for a papal audience, also recognized the vice-president’s limousine. What got to me was the typical reporting of the secular media. Here is a small sample from Friday’s USA Today:
“Did Pope Benedict take Vice President Biden to school today on abortion? We may not know. Their brief Vatican meeting today was strictly private, diplomatic speak for how we're not going to get photos or a transcript of Pope Benedict XVI's meeting, just like we didn't get them when then-speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi visited Benedict in 2009. What unites the visits of the top American leaders? These are two faithful, Mass-attending Catholics who vote for all the social justice issues that the U.S. bishops stand for on topics like peace, poverty and immigration. But their views favoring abortion rights wipe all that away to the thinking of those for whom abortion is a litmus test….The Associated Press, in covering the Biden/Benedict visit, picked up the Catholic Vote "non-negotiable" lingo that actually never appears in the current U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops policy on Faithful Citizenship. That document, intended to guide voters on Catholic teachings, not to endorse specific candidates, has traditionally been reissued each presidential election cycle. Last time, conservatives, campaigning for stronger public condemnation, and denial of communion for Catholic politicians who support abortion rights, were unhappy with the document. Later this month, when the bishops hold their semiannual meeting, they're set to discuss whether they're going to plunge into the fray again, revising Faithful Citizenship for 2012….”
It is absolutely true, and so the Church teaches, that only God can read the hearts of all men. But it is likewise absolutely true that, because of the gift of free will, no one is forced by God to profess the Catholic Faith, so that anyone who wills to be a Catholic and so to be known by others as a Catholic has a responsibility to be Catholic with honesty and integrity: to profess the Faith correctly and in its entirety. To equate faithful Catholicism with, as this reporter states,…Mass attending...is absurd, since even the most hardened of unrepentant sinners, or any schismatic, or any Lutheran, or even any atheist, is free to attend Mass every Sunday and they are even free, as the modernists would put it,…to get something out of it…. But that something cannot be sanctifying grace if they in any direct way act to make abortion possible, and thus that person who makes abortion possible is not a faithful Catholic, no matter how often they attend Mass or even may—sacrilegiously—receive Holy Communion. The sacraments are not magic; they do not turn sinners into saints unless the sinner chooses repentance for himself as the narrow door to eternal life. Quite frankly, I had had it—had it with all this continuing public intentional misstatement of what the Church believes and teaches and all the intentional miss-definition of what is a faithful Catholic. Then I took another hard look at today’s Gospel—the Sunday after Ascension Thursday—and allowed a little humility to substitute for what I was believing was my entitlement to anger and judgment of what surely are sins of the enemies of life:
…These things I have spoken to you that you may not be scandalized. They will expel you from the synagogues. Yes, the hour is coming for everyone who kills you to think he is offering worship to God. And these things they will do because they have not known the Father nor Me. But these things I have spoken to you, that when the time for them has come you may remember that I told you….
And then I came across this meditation written by Pope Benedict when he was Cardinal Ratzinger:
You are surely familiar with all those precious, naïve images in which only the feet of Jesus are visible, sticking out of the cloud, at the heads of the apostles. The cloud, for its part, is a dark circle on the perimeter; on the inside, however, blazing light. It occurs to me that precisely in the apparent naïveté of this representation something very deep comes into view. All we see of Christ in the time of history are his feet and the cloud. His feet—what are they? We are reminded, first of all, of a peculiar sentence from the Resurrection account in Matthew’s Gospel, where it is said that the women held onto the feet of the Risen Lord and worshipped him. As the Risen One, he towers over earthly proportions. We can still only touch his feet; and we touch them in adoration. Here we could reflect that we come as worshippers, following his trail, close to his footsteps. Praying, we go to him; praying, we touch him, even if in this world, so to speak, always only from below, only from afar, always only on the trail of his earthly steps. At the same time it becomes clear that we do not find the footprints of Christ when we look only below, when we measure only footprints and want to subsume faith in the obvious. The Lord is movement toward above, and only in moving ourselves, in looking up and ascending, do we recognize him. When we read the Church Fathers something important is added. The correct ascent of man occurs precisely where he learns, in humbly turning toward his neighbor, to bow very deeply, down to his feet, down to the gesture of the washing of feet. It is precisely humility, which can bow low, that carries man upward. This is the dynamic of ascent that the feast of the Ascension wants to teach us.
I looked in my hand missal and, sure enough, on the page picturing the Ascension—no head, only the feet, of Our Lord. What is God telling us by all the activities of evil that seem now to be surrounding and enveloping the Church? Surely more penance, and repentance, and charity—on our part—and better use of the gifts of the Holy Spirit—wisdom, understanding, counsel, fortitude, knowledge, piety, and fear of the Lord—gifts we have from our Confirmation—gifts to be activated when we encounter any of the forces of evil—whether they are hot or cold or indifferent. And our faith must always come with humility—a faith that never forgets that God is God, and that I am no and never will be, God; a faith that knows that, neither my own wisdom, nor the forces of evil, but Divine Providence has control of all things. And perhaps most of all, a faith that believes, just as He always has, He still remains with us, guiding the Church now through all this mess—through everything—believing that, at last, He will come again—finally—in glory.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment